- Evaluate a 2-player game of Risk, with the objective of uncovering methods for accurately predicting the locations of your opponents pieces and their strategy under the following conditions:
- You can only “see” your pieces
- You know the number of turns that have occurred, and their order
- You know where your enemy has attacked you, and with how many pieces you were attacked by

- The Modeling of Emotions thru their effect on decision making
- The general idea:
- Like the old adage, “you can’t measure the wind but you can measure its effect on things.” It is my thought that, while yes you can not measure emotions, you might be able to measure their effect on strategies. And also like the wind, after having measured their effect it may be possible to arrive at some conclusions about the nature of emotions. For example, perhaps we find that the effect an emotion has on strategy decays with time; and we find that this is somehow proportional to how an emotion decays with time. It is not crazy to assume it may be possible to find a decay function for emotions, which may then lend us new insight.

- The general idea:
- An approximation for the Zeta-Function
- A question that has long consumed my mind is that of the Riemann’s Hypothesis. This question has led me to ponder, “might it be possible to approximate Zeta; and, with that approximation, write a proof showing that if the approximation zeros lie on the critical strip then the same is true for Zeta does too(show Zeta is bounded by an alternating convergent series)?”
- Clearly, I recognize as an undergrad it is MORE than ambitious to try and solve Riemann’s. That said, it’s not crazy to think I could find several approximations for Zeta.

- A question that has long consumed my mind is that of the Riemann’s Hypothesis. This question has led me to ponder, “might it be possible to approximate Zeta; and, with that approximation, write a proof showing that if the approximation zeros lie on the critical strip then the same is true for Zeta does too(show Zeta is bounded by an alternating convergent series)?”

9Jan17

I have decided on a project:

The proposal of a new path predictive algorithm and its analysis compared to known/existing algorithms. The project incorporates data from GIS software and GPS; which, will be analyzed to derive relevant constants(example: time at a stop light) for a series of linear differential equations and then applied to a graph, in order, to derive an algorithm to predict the path an individual is likely to take. Next, I will build a program to compare the results of the algorithm, other known algorithms, and the actual path taken.

31Apr17

I’ll be back to post my work, as well as an early presentation, and a copy of the draft paper…